Skip to main content

Cities: bragging or shaming



Happy New Year! It's been a few years since I've seen in the New Year in Edinburgh. Traditionally we go to the warmth of South East Asia for Christmas so it's been a delight to discover that Edinburgh (and Fife, come to that) is the place for parties around this time. The Scots are known to get pretty excited about seeing in a New Year. They do torchlight processions, fireworks, they walk the cold but beautifully lit streets sharing swigs from their whisky with each other. The first time I came across this more than 15 years ago, I thought it rather cute if a tad unhygienic... The city council is busy bragging that 100,000 visitors will come to Edinburgh for the New Year, boosting the City coffers by £25m over the weekend.

Friends around the world are also bragging that their city - Berlin, Dubai, Sydney, London - has the biggest fireworks or the biggest party in all the world. The amount of fun to be had at times like this obviously drives home the pride in one's city - just as, say, an Olympics might do, or a Festival, or being voted the safest, cleanest, friendliest, prettiest, most cultured and a host of other best positions. 

 Every city can be the best in the world in something. The ability to attract visitors, investment and talent is pretty crucial for cities who want to claim the crown as best financial, shopping, cultural, business centre in the world. The safety of citizens as they go about their work and social life, and their ability to travel easily around the city are key ingredients. Mayors and City Councils aim to do as well as possible in one of the many global city league tables. A quick glance at AT Kearney Global Cities Index and Global Sherpa enlightens, you only need to look at  Ken Livingstone, Boris Johnston, Rudy Giuliani, Michael Bloomberg, each of whom have created a clear leadership legacy for their tenure in London and New York - mostly around cleaning up, speeding up, making their cities safer, more fun, or more businesslike than the next. 

 So it pains me greatly to think about the effect on India's capital city, of stomach-churning events such as the gang-rape and brutal murder of 23 year-old 'Nirbaya' in Delhi - a city I have visited often, and love for its colours, bustling, noise and people. How will this affect the already questionable reputation of Delhi as a destination city for investment and tourism? The people of Delhi, the people of India and thousands around the world are taking to the streets and online platforms to demand that Something Is Done to make Delhi safer for women and indeed citizens in general, and for legislative and policing infrastructure, now burdened by corruption and inefficiency, to have the capability to bring criminals to book quickly and effectively. Sheila Dikshit, Delhi's Chief Minister felt this anger as she was treated with contempt by crowds of angry citizens. Corruption and bureaucracy are already two notable elements of India's negative reputation.

 A distinct lack of leadership comes across. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh says he is 'saddened' by this event. Saddened?? Sonia Gandhi makes stronger anger statements but where is the action, or even the promise of action? Granted, there is A Big Job to be done. Not just from improved legislation and tightening up the systems of law and order but also in the long haul of changing the mindsets of men in power that women are not objects of abuse. Many cities around the world have made major improvements for their citizens through a shared political will and understanding that change involves a good honest look at what need to be corrected, a shared commitment to put aside political, ethnic and religious differences for the common good, real investment in talent and resources and most importantly, strong leadership. 

 The safety of women in Delhi hangs in the balance, and so does Delhi's reputation as a destination for international visitors and thereafter, as a city to be taken seriously in world business, politics and culture. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Power or gender?

Recently I went to a concert at Edinburgh's Usher Hall where one of the soloists was an incredibly handsome and talented young Macedonian guitarist. I was introduced to him at the interval and told him enthusiastically how much I appreciated his playing. I also told him how gorgeous I thought he was. To be exact, I told him that I'd marry him and leave my husband (this was clearly banter, and my husband was standing beside me at the time). He took it warmly and charmingly and responded with matching repartee. So here's the question. Had I been a 61 year old man and he a gorgeous young female artist, would I be accused of sexism, of being patronising? Is it okay for a 61 year old woman to say these things because I believe my guitarist to be perfectly safe from any power play from me? Because I believe there is zero chance that anything I might say to him would be received with any real or threatening sexual connotation? Social norms of course change all the time, as we...
4 comments
Read more

Of leaders, lies and euphemisms

We can describe lying in as many ways as we like... I love Lucy Kellaway's FT columns, this one from February last year is a classic. I got to thinking about leaders and lies, and how lies are euphemistically described when Sir John Chilcot today described Tony Blair as "not straight with the nation" on the Iraq war when he was British Prime Minister. Sir Robert Armstrong, British Cabinet Secretary said during the 'Spycatcher' trial in 1986 that a book written by a former MI5 employee "...contains a misleading impression, not a lie. It was being economical with the truth.". More recently Kellyanne Conway introduced us to the notion of "alternative facts" http://bit.do/dySAA Is it no surprise therefore that Edelman's 2017 Trust barometer finds "that trust is in crisis around the world. The general population’s trust in all four key institutions — business, government, NGOs, and media — has declined broadly, a phenomenon not report...
2 comments
Read more

Panic and the absence of leadership

I often borrow a line commonly used in crime movies when I see yet another leadership organisation fall from grace: "You could have done this the easy way, but you chose to do it the hard way". Oxfam  was a hitherto admired institution, having done impressive work around the world for more than 75 years, respected for its engagement with donors big and small, its courage in working in war- and disaster-torn regions, and its commitment to equality and fairness. The Haiti scandal has rocked it to its core, putting into question its ability to continue its operations, as governments are rethinking funding levels, donors withdrawing sponsorship and customers pulling out of their shops. In other words, it is losing its licence to operate. There are so many lessons that can be learned from brands which fail to protect their culture, vision and reputation. United Airlines CEO's response to the treatment of one of its passengers on a flight, Bell Pottinger's colla...
Post a Comment
Read more