Skip to main content

Founders Keepers - family businesses

Dan Edelman, a giant character and patriarch of the PR world, founder of Edelman Public Relations died yesterday. He and his family - especially his son Richard who took over as CEO in 1996, grew the company to the global size and scale it is today. Founded in 1952, it now operates in 66 countries employing over 4500 people with revenues of $637m. Although regularly courted by potential suitors and buyers, they remain fiercely independent. Dan stayed involved in the company right to the end of his life; the legacy he left behind is kept alive not just by the family, it is also embedded in the institutional memory of the firm. No Edelman employee, however junior, would not know the history and the journey the firm has travelled in its 60-year history.

I have long been fascinated by family firms, since observing the difference between the seven years I worked for Edelman running its UK operations and the seven years before that, when I worked for a publicly owned corporation.

Like it or not, there is never any doubt as to who makes the final decisions in a family-run business - but decisions are made quickly, simply, cleanly. Whatever frustrates you when working for a family firm, it's very rarely because decision-making is slow and cumbersome. Working for a family business means you do become part of an extended family although you should never forget that you will never actually be part of the family. For many entrepreneurially minded people this is as good as it gets. The most passionately committed colleagues I have ever worked with were Edelman colleagues. The longest lasting friendships - until today - I've had with ex colleagues are with Edelman people from all over the world. We had loud and fierce arguments with each other and with our owners but we were always supportive of each other and proud of our company. Yes, our owners would almost always win but we had what many of our counterparts in publicly owned corporations don't have, a louder voice. Shorter decision-making helped motivate businesses, and the almost obsessive wish always to be the first with new ideas meant that creativity and innovation flourished. Running an Edelman business felt like running our own business. Achieving this sense of ownership from a leadership team is of course, the Holy Grail for any organisation.

There were downsides. Relationship management becomes very personal, not unlike a large group of siblings. Getting the attention of the owner becomes even more important than making sure a 'normal' CEO knows when you'd done something clever. Conversely, being and staying in your owner's good books is a must. There is no court of appeal for those who were 'out'. Often, as a family business expands globally, taking on other national cultures is tougher at the early stages - absorbing the family culture is not always easy when you're translating a corporate culture across continents.

So what of the results?

PWC's Family Business Survey 2012 found that family businesses are thriving globally - 65% of family businesses have grown sales in 2011 compared with less than half in 2010. They're also much more ambitious and confident about their prospects. PWC summarised family business characteristics as having longer term thinking and broader perspectives, quicker and more flexible decision-making, an entrepreneurial mindset, greater commitment to jobs and the community and a more personal approach to business based on trust.

In the Gulf region, more that 80% of businesses are either family-run or controlled by families. Family Enterprise USA a year ago placed family businesses in the USA as employing 63% of the workforce and generating 57% of GDP. Its CEO Ann Kincade said: "Beyond the profit motive, they are focused on legacy-creation and community enhancement..... Family businesses have leadership tenure for or five times longer than their non-family counterparts and carry much greater equity as they plan to responsibly invest in growing the company".

There is much that publicly owned corporations, who in today's disastrous economy are suffering from falls in sales, margins and confidence, can learn from family businesses. Can they replicate the model of a family business without a family driving the business? Can they instil a sense of passion and ownership among senior managers beyond their remuneration and bonuses? A lot can be done in shortening decision-making, in encouraging the passion (not just the culture) of innovation, in giving employees and managers a bigger voice, in thinking longer term, in managing rewards that will work towards achieving the success of family businesses.

But most of all, it's the staying power of running a business which is as much about its legacy as it is about early returns for shareholders that makes the biggest difference. And this is arguably, the toughest call.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Power or gender?

Recently I went to a concert at Edinburgh's Usher Hall where one of the soloists was an incredibly handsome and talented young Macedonian guitarist. I was introduced to him at the interval and told him enthusiastically how much I appreciated his playing. I also told him how gorgeous I thought he was. To be exact, I told him that I'd marry him and leave my husband (this was clearly banter, and my husband was standing beside me at the time). He took it warmly and charmingly and responded with matching repartee. So here's the question. Had I been a 61 year old man and he a gorgeous young female artist, would I be accused of sexism, of being patronising? Is it okay for a 61 year old woman to say these things because I believe my guitarist to be perfectly safe from any power play from me? Because I believe there is zero chance that anything I might say to him would be received with any real or threatening sexual connotation? Social norms of course change all the time, as we...

Of leaders, lies and euphemisms

We can describe lying in as many ways as we like... I love Lucy Kellaway's FT columns, this one from February last year is a classic. I got to thinking about leaders and lies, and how lies are euphemistically described when Sir John Chilcot today described Tony Blair as "not straight with the nation" on the Iraq war when he was British Prime Minister. Sir Robert Armstrong, British Cabinet Secretary said during the 'Spycatcher' trial in 1986 that a book written by a former MI5 employee "...contains a misleading impression, not a lie. It was being economical with the truth.". More recently Kellyanne Conway introduced us to the notion of "alternative facts" http://bit.do/dySAA Is it no surprise therefore that Edelman's 2017 Trust barometer finds "that trust is in crisis around the world. The general population’s trust in all four key institutions — business, government, NGOs, and media — has declined broadly, a phenomenon not report...

Panic and the absence of leadership

I often borrow a line commonly used in crime movies when I see yet another leadership organisation fall from grace: "You could have done this the easy way, but you chose to do it the hard way". Oxfam  was a hitherto admired institution, having done impressive work around the world for more than 75 years, respected for its engagement with donors big and small, its courage in working in war- and disaster-torn regions, and its commitment to equality and fairness. The Haiti scandal has rocked it to its core, putting into question its ability to continue its operations, as governments are rethinking funding levels, donors withdrawing sponsorship and customers pulling out of their shops. In other words, it is losing its licence to operate. There are so many lessons that can be learned from brands which fail to protect their culture, vision and reputation. United Airlines CEO's response to the treatment of one of its passengers on a flight, Bell Pottinger's colla...